TheNewTopical.com - current events, politics, culture, ethics, economics discussion forum  

Go Back   TheNewTopical.com - current events, politics, culture, ethics, economics discussion forum » Main Forum » General & Current Events

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-09-10, 12:50 AM
contracycle's Avatar
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,832
Default Mars Farming Gets Green Thumbs-Up

Mars Farming Gets Green Thumbs-Up

* By Brandon Keim




Mars explorers could use complicated mechanical systems to produce oxygen and filter waste, and eat food carried from Earth. Or they could just save a lot of hassle and plant crops.

A model of Martian gravity’s effects on water flow, nutrient dynamics and root-feeding microbes suggests it’s possible to farm in the Red Planet’s soil.

digg“In terms of biogeochemistry and in interms of hydraulics, I’m pretty confident it could work,” said Federico Maggi, a University of Sydney biogeochemist who conducted the simulation.

Growing plants in soil on Mars might seem old-fashioned for those raised on the futuristic prospect of hydroponic or aeroponic agriculture, in which crops sprout soil-free nutrient broths or mists.

But in recent years, starry-eyed biologists have come to appreciate the importance of soil-dwelling microbes to plant roots and soil processes. Moreover, soil-based agriculture is backed by thousands of years of human-based research and development, and millions of years of natural evolution.

“Mechanical systems are very reliable over short-term expeditions,” said Maggi. “But soil can control itself. In terms of operation error, it’s more reliable. Plants provide more benefits in terms of energy and health. And real soil performs operations that other systems cannot.”

However, there are many unknowns about extraterrestrial agricultural biology. Among the most important is how low gravity will affect the flow of water and nutrients, and in turn microbes. Once water and nutrients get into the plants, capillary action will take care of the rest. But getting them there is the key.

“If there’s low gravity, water will not flow down so quick. The transport of nutrients would also be slower. If transport of nutrients towards root microorganisms is not fast enough, it will suffocate them,” said Maggi.

In a July Advances in Space Research study, Maggi and University of California, Berkeley biogeophysicist Céline Pallud simulated both Mars- and Earth-gravity root processes using BIOTOUGHREACT, a well-regarded model of soil nutrient transport and microbe dynamics developed at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

The simulation suggests that slower water transport is actually a good thing, preventing water from falling through the soil and being lost, along with the nitrogen it absorbs on the way.

At Mars gravity — about one-third of Earth’s — up to 90 percent less water would be needed than in a terrestrial greenhouse, said the researchers. Much less nitrogen would also be needed.

“You don’t have a leaching of nutrients. The nutrients you put into the soil, remain in the soil. You don’t lose them,” said Maggi. The simulated bacteria thrived on all this extra food, reaching densities between five and 10 times the usual.

According to University of Florida agricultural engineer Ray Bucklin, an advisor to the Mars Foundation and author of several NASA reports on Mars greenhouse design, the nitrogen savings could be especially important.

“Mars is nitrogen-depleted,” and any fertilizer would need to come from Earth, he said. “And in terms of the soil microbes, they would be in a pretty beneficial situation.”

Bucklin warned that the real-world water savings would likely be much less than 90 percent. “Water movement through a plant has several other things that influence it besides what happens in the soil,” he said. At low gravity and low atmospheric pressure, “water movement through the plant would be accelerated.”

But Bucklin still said the study “is interesting and needed to be done.”

According to NASA plant physiologist Raymond Wheeler, most extraterrestrial crop researchers have used hydroponics or artificial soil, “which simplify their testing and allow easy recycling of water and nutrients.” But real soils “might have certain advantages,” including better waste degradation and a built-in buffer against water shortages or equipment malfunction.

Maggi plans to perform more simulations on how other important plant nutrients, such as potassium and iron, will behave.

Of course, the ultimate tests will come on Mars itself, and NASA’s budget problems have put a damper on such dreams. But even if NASA has problems, other programs — especially the European Space Agency — intend to have people on Mars by mid-century. Private enterprise could also sponsor the voyage.

“We already have the engineering to put a base on Mars,” said Bucklin. “If Bill Gates wanted to blow his whole fortune, he could do it right now.”


Read More Mars Farming Gets Green Thumbs-Up | Wired Science | Wired.com

...


“We already have the engineering to put a base on Mars,” said Bucklin. “If Bill Gates wanted to blow his whole fortune, he could do it right now.”
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03-09-10, 10:02 AM
Gilles de Rais's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,085
Default

Old SF trope. I am less convinced by scientists' cost estimates. In the past, they've not been entirely reliable, have they?

But, frankly, if the entire bill is below $500 billions, it should be done. It'd be money well spent...
__________________
Unless otherwise specified, I am posting as a regular poster. When I will act as a mod, I'll make sure you're in no doubt.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 03-09-10, 03:31 PM
contracycle's Avatar
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,832
Default

I don't seen any cost estimates as such. The point remains that this is someone at NASA, not a fiction author, saying we have the engineering capacity.

Last edited by contracycle; 03-09-10 at 03:34 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 03-09-10, 07:27 PM
PostmodernProphet's Avatar
full immersion.....
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,194
Default

Originally Posted by Gilles de Rais View Post
Old SF trope. I am less convinced by scientists' cost estimates. In the past, they've not been entirely reliable, have they?

But, frankly, if the entire bill is below $500 billions, it should be done. It'd be money well spent...
would the money be as well spent if they only found a way to grow crops in the Sahara?......
__________________
....attached to sanity by a bungee cord.....
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 03-09-10, 09:03 PM
Gilles de Rais's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,085
Default

Originally Posted by PostmodernProphet View Post
would the money be as well spent if they only found a way to grow crops in the Sahara?......
No. We will need a new planet, sooner or later.
__________________
Unless otherwise specified, I am posting as a regular poster. When I will act as a mod, I'll make sure you're in no doubt.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 03-09-10, 10:45 PM
PostmodernProphet's Avatar
full immersion.....
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,194
Default

Originally Posted by Gilles de Rais View Post
No. We will need a new planet, sooner or later.
lol.....how about if we grow things in the Sahara, we stay and only you leave...would that make everyone happy?.....
__________________
....attached to sanity by a bungee cord.....
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 03-09-10, 11:03 PM
Zichao's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 8,367
Default

Anyway, we need the Sahara for solar panels. We'll grow the crops on the rest of Africa once it's been bought by Asia...
__________________
Standard disclaimer: the disgusting statements contained in this post are the views of the poster, and unless specified do not represent the views of the moderators or the site's owners.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 04-09-10, 07:33 AM
Gilles de Rais's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,085
Default

Originally Posted by PostmodernProphet View Post
lol.....how about if we grow things in the Sahara, we stay and only you leave...would that make everyone happy?.....
Well, I'd feel awefully embarassed to have the NASA spending $500 bil on just little ol' me. Gimme $500 mil and I promise to be happy right here and now...

But what's that obsession with growing food in the Sahara? World hunger is about economic arrangements, not about lack of supply...
__________________
Unless otherwise specified, I am posting as a regular poster. When I will act as a mod, I'll make sure you're in no doubt.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 04-09-10, 03:40 PM
PostmodernProphet's Avatar
full immersion.....
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,194
Default

Originally Posted by Gilles de Rais View Post
But what's that obsession with growing food in the Sahara? World hunger is about economic arrangements, not about lack of supply...
ah, sorry....just my obscure way of saying we ought to be more concerned with Earth's hunger than Martian hunger.....
__________________
....attached to sanity by a bungee cord.....
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 07-09-10, 02:02 PM
Gilles de Rais's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,085
Default

Originally Posted by PostmodernProphet View Post
ah, sorry....just my obscure way of saying we ought to be more concerned with Earth's hunger than Martian hunger.....
I am not sure why you think we are looking to feed non-existent Martians.

As to Earth's problems, they might require lots of things, including money but money is not really the main limitating factor... These tend to be political in nature.
__________________
Unless otherwise specified, I am posting as a regular poster. When I will act as a mod, I'll make sure you're in no doubt.
Reply With Quote
Reply


(View-All Members who have read this thread : 6
contracycle, Francois Cellier, Gilles de Rais, PostmodernProphet, roadkill, Zichao
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0